Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Peter Jeschke found guilty in third case but second case is still dragging.

Thank You to the reporter who contacted me and gave me the link to the story!

As it turns out Mr Jeschke was found guilty of probation violations this past Monday. What  might surprise you is how the Santa Barbara community has responded to this case and the handling of convicted sex offender Peter Jeschke.

Sex offender convicted on 2011 charges, 2008 charges still pending (Why the slow row on this case?)

Date: 2011-06-01, 1:09PM PDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here [Errors when replying to ads?]

My comment to Mr Jeschke being found Guilty of probation violations this past Monday, he makes District Attorney Joyce Dudley look like an fool! The story on the violations and other comments follow mine. You can also follow my earlier postings on this convicted sex offender @
( my response to comments found at the above link)

Mr Jeschke's picture does not come up on Megans law because of a loop hole that the Santa Barbara D.A. and Courts allowed him to use. Depending on the type of convictions one can file a request with Megans web site that there picture is not be posted on Megans page. But they must register with local law enforcement regardless. The loop hole however does not allow for the convicted sex offender to violate probation or pick up additional charges. Mr Jeschke has accomplished both those feats now. It is the D.A.'s foot dragging with the second case that has allowed his picture to not appear on Megan's web site for over two years now

Peter Jeschke

What we need to understand is that this probation violation which is the story above comes from Mr Jeschkes 3rd case this year and not his second case from February 2008. A preliminary hearing on his second case that bound him over for trial took place over a year ago for allegedly disdaining a witness. In fact had he been found guilty in a reasonable amount of time on the second case chances are these current probation violations might never have happen. Which means we put children at risk that need not be!

One other thing that bothers me was the terms of his original probation and his limited computer use. I would have liked to get a more realistic understanding of his conviction and crimes when the conviction was first announced.

I do not need to talk of his preferential treatment because it stands out all by it's self.

10 MILLION dollars in Real Estate fraud and limited charges for Mike Wilson with a chance to buy his sentence down in half for returning 20% of the money? Or how about only 1 charge for 60 victims like the David Abraham's insurance scam. An by the way your telling me an insurance company did not have insurance protection for there clients losses, who are you kidding (E&O). Yet nun chucks on a Bruce Lee poster will get a 15 year old minor Federal Racketeering charges as in 'Gator Roll"

pazzingtime (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

read other comments first than the story;

Independent Discussion Guidelines

Interesting how Judge Ochoa found no other choice but to sentence a gang member who showed some promise of change 16 years, but this dirtbag gets break after break. I guess race has nothing to do with it.

AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2011 at 3:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

i agree if you do the time you should do the crime... color should never be a factor... racism is alive and well in 2011... i say hang him by his manly goods ....

37087pav (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2011 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Could be race, could also be $$$.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2011 at 8:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Judge Ochoa's judgement skills seem questionable most definitetly.

EZK (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2011 at 11:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

He belong in prison. I hope Ochoa doesn't mess up yet again.

taz (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2011 at 11:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You're being kind EZK, and yes, I too hope Ochoa doesn't mess up again.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 31, 2011 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

No $$$, because he claims to be unemployed and living with mommy.

AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 31, 2011 at 4:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

But isn't his family based in Montecito?

billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 31, 2011 at 6:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Not too sure, but interestingly enough he does not come up in Megan's Law website. Wonder why?

AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 31, 2011 at 8:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"...he does not come up in Megan's Law website. Wonder why?"-AZ2SB

Convicted sex offenders are required to register with local law enforcement but that doesn't mean that they will. The most probable answer to your question is that he simply hasn't registered himself. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. He's a sick, manipulative sociopath.

Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The most recent story
Tennis Coach Convicted of Sex Crimes Violates Probation

Smoked Weed, Drank Alcohol, and Accessed Online Pornography

Monday, May 30, 2011

Peter Jeschke, a former high school tennis coach found guilty of a variety of sex crimes with a minor in 2009, violated his probation, ruled Judge Frank Ochoa Friday morning.

The judge found that Jeschke violated probation in a variety of ways: He used marijuana and alcohol, didn't report a second residence -- that of a girlfriend who had a 17-year-old daughter -- he was sleeping at most nights, accessed pornography on a computer, and was teaching tennis to a minor without a signed waiver from her parents.

Ochoa found the last point to be technical in nature, as Jeschke had reasonably believed his attorney took care of the waiver.

But the others, Ochoa said, were more egregious. He noted the original terms of probation that completely limited Jeschke's computer use. But the defendant had negotiated an agreement that he be able to use his own computer for business. He was found to have accessed the pornography on a companion's laptop. "It was a very particular term he negotiated for, and then breached," the judge said.

Jeschke was sentenced in 2009 to probation and had to register as a sex offender after being found guilty of seven charges, including sexual penetration by a foreign object with a minor, three counts of oral copulation with a minor, and two counts of sex with a minor more than three years younger than himself. The counts were related to conduct with a girl on the Santa Barbara High School tennis team. Witnesses testified he also provided the teens with alcohol on trips.

Jeschke, who remains in jail on a no bail hold, is awaiting trial on allegations of dissuading witnesses and soliciting a person to commit a crime relating to alleged conduct during the first trial. He allegedly talked a former tennis player of his into sending threatening messages to witnesses during the trial, the day before the girls were to testify.

The probation violation could open Jeschke up to a prison term. He will be sentenced in that case on June 27. His next court appearance on the other charges is Thursday. 

  • Location: Why the slow row on this case?
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2415260182

No comments: