Monday, January 23, 2012

Did you know Larry Mendoza in Santa Barbara has these kind of ties to Law Enforcement?

 
I am not sure whether you know this or not but I catch a ton of grief for the findings i place on my blog.I constantly receive messages that tell me to “go to hell’ or “ fu*# off and die”. If they have a real low I.Q. they might try to get a rise out of me by leaving some type of racist remark. What no one has done to date is challenge my findings with any verifiable data.They can call me all the names in the book or threaten to harm me again. But they only do that in an attempt to take attention away from my results and the facts in them that I share with you. 


Let me share a little bit about me. I used to live in a slice of Heaven here on Earth called GALT CA. My son Vincent’s first little league team was coached by my employers husband Terry. At the time Terry happened to work in Sacramento California for the State Probation Department. I also played on Terry's adult softball team for 5 years. Our team was made up of Terry from probation, two youth authority guards from Stockton, two California prison guards and one sheriff. I am proud to say we had one City championship as well as two second place finishes.  



During Manuel and Vincent’s second and third years of little league in Galt their baseball coach Steve. He was a Lodi police officer and a member of their S.W.A.T. team. In fact when we moved back to Santa Barbara it was Steve's wife who we chose to sell our house. During this time I also played softball on Terry's team for 5 years. On our team we had Terry from probation, two youth authority and two prison guards as well as one sheriff. Now Galt also happens to be home to the California Prison Guard academy and my old friend from San Jose Ray is not only the self defense arrest control instructor there he is also part of the California State prison gang task force. Now since I am sharing all this my brother in law is a sheriff at the Santa Clara Jail, oh and please let’s not forget my baby sister Mia who works in local law enforcement as well.



I must apologize to all my local friends in and around Santa Barbara you know how much I value your friendship and support! 
I would never allow those people I call friends and loved ones to be harmed by anyone. I would never be afraid to prosecute anyone as the law allows for a crime they have been charged with. Now because I feel this I must always be willing to sit on a jury and convict ANYONE if the evidence supports the charges. My point is this I am all about following the law, living my life as a good and responsible citizen. However because of the subject matters that I choose to explore some people try to discredit me and what I stand for. All I am doing is protecting our Constitution and my question to those who oppose me, why aren’t you?


S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!

Saturday, January 14, 2012

William M. Windsor of LawlessAmerica.com invites you to an online meeting to save America. SOCK - Save Our Constitution Konvention - How to Watch, Listen, or Participate

SOCK -- Save Our Constitution Konvention -- will be held THIS WEEK -- Sunday, January 15, 2012 from 5- 7 pm Eastern Time.
Here are step-by-step instructions on how to watch, listen, and/or participate..
For the best experience, register ahead of time.  It takes just a minute....

 WATCH the Online TV Broadcast

Watching and listening to the broadcast is simple.  All you do is go to www.Livestream.com/lawlessamerica on Sunday between 5 and 7 pm.  Sit back and watch and listen.
To participate by sharing your comments on the Chat Screen, it's best to register at www.Livestream.com.  It's free.  Go to the Livestream.com Sign-Up Page.  Enter your name, email, password, etc.  Once you finish, Livestream.com will send you more detail and important links via email, so keep an eye out.
Once you have registered, click on the Livestream logo and in the "Search Channels" window, enter lawless america.  When a little TV window displays ont he screen, click on the screen, and it will take you to the Lawless America broadcast.
To chat, just type your thoughts and click "Say."  You may have to login in the chat window.  If it asks for that, just enter your login name and password.
You will see the broadcast in the window on the left, and you can follow the chat in the Chat Screen on the right.
If you need help, go to http://www.livestream.com/support.
If you would like to give a presentation on camera, please email Bill@LawlessAmerica.com

Listen on the Computer

Listening is also easy.
The Talk Radio broadcast will be on www.TalkShoe.comCall ID: 115884. 
Click here to join the call or just listen along
 Bill Windsor and the people talking on TalkShoe are the audio portion of the broadcast.  So, whether you are watching at Livestream or listening only at TalkShoe, you will hear the same audio.

Participate

Call in by phone -- 724-444-7444.  Enter: 115884 # (Call ID).  Enter: 1 # or your PIN (if you are a registered TalkShoe member).
(Optional) Become a TalkShoe member -- Register for extra features.  It's free. If you want to speak to the viewers and listeners, please register at TalkShoe.com, and email bill@lawlessamerica.com with your username, so I will be able to recognize you when you appear on the participant's list. 
We will try to keep all of the chat on the Livestream screen.  So, call in on TalkShoe, but pull up www.Livestream.com/lawlessamerica to watch the show and hear the TalkShoe discussions, and you can chat there.

Please Share Your Ideas

Please share your ideas and send questions to me by email -- Bill@LawlessAmerica.com
This conference will feature movers and shakers who want to work together to make some things happen in the battle against judicial corruption and government corruption. 
Article listing some of the participants.
Article discussing the Agenda
More Agenda Ideas
Article with Details of TalkShoe Talk Radio Broadcast
Article with Call for Papers
Reason for the Save Our Constitution Konvention
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 SOCK Update

  William M. Windsor

I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney.  This website expresses my OPINIONS.   The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions.  This website does not provide legal advice.  I do not give legal advice.  I do not practice law.  This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed.  Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website.  The law is a gray area at best.  Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.

You can also view his you tube message @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF90o82Sf0s&feature=player_embedded


S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!

Friday, January 13, 2012

The California pension system not in crisis reports Lee Saunders the secretary-treasurer of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Over the past 20 years, the California Public Employees' Retirement System has earned an average annual investment return of 8.4 percent, which is more than the fund needs to ensure it can pay long-term benefits


For almost two years now I have been questioning the reported Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability UAAL for our Santa Barbara County Employees Pension System (S.B.C.E.R.S.) on my blog @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com . There are several different reasons for my concerns. My most recent concern came about after I learned that the S.B.C.E.R.S pension is now reporting a 24 year compound average returns on investments. To being an outstanding rate of 8.5%, this fact can be verified in their 2011 Valuation report on page 26 @ http://sbcers-trustee.com/Documents/2011-10-26-002b-BOR-ActuarialValuationJune30,2011.pdf  

Earlier this month Lee Saunders the secretary-treasurer of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) has voiced his similar concerns with CalPers. Mr. Saunders reports in an article dated January 2cnd 2012 that over the past 20 years, the California Public Employees' Retirement System has earned an average annual investment return of 8.4 percent. Finally someone else has done the research and checked the math and seems to agree with me. Based on these types of yearly returns it is mathematically impossible for CalPers and the S.B.C.E.R.S. to be anything but healthy and properly funded. I will spend some time this week and try to contact Mr. Saunders so that we may share our research with each other. The full article is here for your review, along with several posting links from my blog. I am hoping the data contained in my stories will grab the attention of our Union Brothers and Sisters. 

California pension system not in crisis @ http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/01/EDQN1MIA0B.DTL
Despite those who are all-too-willing to play Chicken Little, the sky is not falling on the California pension system.
Here are the facts. Over the past 20 years, the California Public Employees' Retirement System has earned an average annual investment return of 8.4 percent, which is more than the fund needs to ensure it can pay long-term benefits. Since the market crash of 2008, CalPERS has recovered from its losses and is now funded at 75 percent, a healthy level by the mark of rating agencies.

A recent report on public pensions released by the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research flies in the face of these facts, favoring instead trumped-up assumptions that CalPERS earnings are much lower. For reasons unknown, or at least unsaid, the report asserts that CalPERS earnings stand at just 6.2 percent per year, a rate they suggest is breeding a growing shortfall in the fund.

That is not a fact, and SIEPR knows it. SIEPR knows that 6.2 percent isn't the actual earnings rate. Instead, that number reflects "the long-term historical average for investors allocating capital in the same manner as pension funds." In other words, they found investors who put money into the market in a way similar to how pension funds invest and used those results instead of CalPERS' actual historical record.

California Treasurer Bill Lockyer resigned as an SIEPR advisory board member after the report was issued, noting tersely: "When it comes to public pensions, maybe SIEPR should stand for 'Stanford Institute to Eviscerate People's Retirement.' "This isn't the first time SIEPR has gotten it wrong. Last winter, they claimed that CalPERS' actual earnings were 4.14 percent, the so-called risk-free earnings rate. That inaccuracy spurred a Little Hoover Commission report, causing public panic over a pension crisis that doesn't exist. After catching much flak from economists, SIEPR issued the new report with its slightly higher earnings projections.

According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, pension costs are among the smallest and slowest-growing in state government, making up less than 3 percent of the total budget. All the while, public-sector unions are helping to ensure that pension funds remain stable and their benefits affordable.That is not to say that there isn't work to be done. While pensions account for less than 3 percent of the budget, corporate tax loopholes amount to tens of billions lost from the budget. Even after budget cuts, new loopholes rob public education and other programs of $1 billion per year, that money instead going to fill the coffers of Wall Street corporations.

Facts are facts. While we know CalPERS and the California Teachers' Retirement System are irreplaceable sources of retirement security for hundreds of thousands of workers, the defined-contribution system favored by its critics is badly broken. According to the Wall Street Journal, the median household headed by a person aged 60 to 62 with a 401(k) has less than one-quarter of the savings needed for retirement. That's a fact we ignore at our own peril.


Lee Saunders is the secretary-treasurer of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME).
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/02/EDQN1MIA0B.DTL
This article appeared on page A - 6 of the San Francisco Chronicle

I have written several blog postings over the past two years sharing both my concerns and findings in regards to the alleged S.B.C.E.R.S. Pension unfunded crisis, and what I think it’s true value should be. My blog can be found @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com . I have listed several of these stories below and each story title also has a link that will take you directly to that story’s location on the web. 

In 1991 the California State Controller Reported that the SBCERS Pensions Previous Funded Levels were as Follows: 12/86 102.0% Funded 12/88 91.0% Funded 12/90 83.0% Funded. In a 2009 Santa Barbara County Document the values have been altered, is that a crime? The 2009 Document shows that in 12/86 the SBCERS was only 67.1% Funded, in 12/88 67.2% Funded, Finally in 12/90 only 61.40% Funded, How Can There Be Such a HUGE VALUE Difference? @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/in-1991-california-state-controller_04.html

 

These 3 attachments are all I need to prove fraud with the SBCERS pension fund. Simply follow my instructions and see for yourself @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/these-3-attachments-are-all-i-need-to.html

Terrence McGuire handles 450 Billion dollars for our State and helps me uncover a Billion dollar heist by Santa Barbara (SBCERS) pension Officials

@ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/terrence-mcguire-handles-450-billion.html

 If Mr. McGuire performed his sworn duty that would be the correct title for this posting.

More Documentation Concerning the Retroactive Change of Value to our SBCERS Pension Fund Between 1995-96 and 1996-97 Reports @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/07/more-documentation-concerning.html

 

California Public Retirement Systems Annual Audit Reports 2007-08 – 1997-98. Also Past Fund Values from 1996-97 – 1978-79 for 5 California County Pensions; Los Angeles(LACERA), Santa Barbara(SBCERS) Ventura(VCERA), Kern(KCERA), and Contra Costa(CCCERS) County @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/07/california-public-retirement-systems.html  Please click on any  orange highlight and that PDF file will open for your review.

Documentation that the SBCERS Pension was 100% Funded in 1986! @ http://santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2011/06/documentation-that-sbcers-pension-was.html

If you find value with my research all I ask is that you share it with as many people as possible. Why can’t I be the person who helped fix America?

Larry “Magic” Mendoza

sb_magic@hotmail.com or 805-636-2302


S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!

GSR on Corey Lyons hands match an automatic Gun. However the murder weapons were 2 REVOLVERS OPPS!


Santa Barbara District Attorney Joyce Dudley and her office of falsicutors has fallen from new heights. It seems they have gone from “Ruse Affidavits” to “Ruse” Convictions like the recent Corey Lyons murder conviction. A ruse is an action or plan which is intended to deceive someone and the Jury in the recent Corey Lyons murder trial was their latest target. In prosecutor Zonen’s closing arguments he clearly stated that” Scharton was shot with a shotgun and .22 caliber(REVOLVER) gun, Daniel with a shotgun and .38 caliber(REVOLVER) gun.”
In the Gun Shot Residue report below (GSR) the author reports that “The presence of copper in most of the hand three-component GSR particles Indicates it was generated by the firing of jacketed bullet(s). Jacketed bullets were not used in these homicides.’ So I went on line to translate what the author was telling us here. Within ten minutes after reading that passage here is what I found http://www.wavesignal.com/Forensics/GSR.html
Bullets The bullet in an automatic pistol cartridge contains a lead core that is covered with a full metal jacket of copper alloyed with 5 to 10% zinc. Revolver bullets are generally composed of lead, or lead plated with a thin layer of copper, or the lead is alloyed with antimony or tin, or with both. In some bullets, such as hollow-point and soft-point bullets, a copper jacket covers the base and cylindrical portion, leaving a soft metal at the tip. Here is what I came up with;BASED ON THE GSR REPORT USED FOR THE COREY LYONS MURDER TRIAL THE FINDINGS ON THE DEFENDANTS HANDS ARE ‘CONSISTENT WITH THAT OF A PERSON HAVING FIRED AN AUTOMATIC WEAPON AND NOT A REVOLVER. THE MURDER WEAPONS WERE A SHOTGUN, A 38 REVOLVER AND A 22 REVOLVER. How is it possible the Santa Barbara District Attorneys office missed that fact.
Due to my poor health I have been unable to create a better posting but one will be complete over this upcoming weekend. Read the GSR report for yourself @ www.meixatech.com/LyonsGSRreport.pdf
Location: murder weapon were 2 REVOLVERS OPPS!
S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!

The Murders of Barbara Sharton and Daniel Lyons. New information shows Huge Discrepancy's between the testimonys given in the trial and the reports about the case found @ http://meixatech.com. Vital Evidence seems to have been kept from the Jury and Public WHY?


Many of the public comments I have read about the three trials in this case all ask why the local law enforcements investigation was completed so poorly. The case presented by our Santa Barbara District Attorney's office left many dumbfounded as to how they were finally able to obtain a conviction with their third attempt.In my continuing attempt to understand the Corey Lyons double murder trial I came upon some startling new information on the Internet. Right now the only question I want to ask is why was this person Bryan R. Burnett retained to examine the evidence in this case, specifically the gunshot residue evidence.Then later the defense requested a scene reconstruction and Burnett was never called to the witness stand? He states on his web page @ http://meixatech.com/CoreyLyons.shtml that upon receiving the reports and images of the two homicides, it became apparent this double homicide was "the most complex of my career". Once again it appears that our Criminal Courts competence, both the prosecution and now the defense, has been called into question by me Larry Mendoza
www.santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com
All the questions and opinions shared in this posting belong to me.


Here is the very interesting web site and reports I recently discovered concerning the Corey Lyons case.

Corey Lyons Case reports and discrepancies can be found @ http://meixatech.com/CoreyLyons.shtml
The Murders of Barbara Sharton and Daniel Lyons (from Bryan Burnett's meixatech.com):

On May 2, 2009 at approximately 1:30 in the morning, Barbara Scharton and Daniel Lyons, were murdered by multiple gunshots in their home on Aurora Street, Santa Barbara, California. Daniel Lyons' brother, Corey, was arrested the morning following the homicides and charge with their murders. The Probable Cause Narrative PROBABLE_CAUSE.pdf ( http://meixatech.com/PROBABLE_CAUSE.pdf ) composed by one of the Santa Barbara detectives describes the case against Corey Lyons.

"I was retained to examine the evidence in this case, specifically the gunshot residue evidence and later asked to do a scene reconstruction. Upon receiving the reports and images of the two homicides, it became apparent this double homicide was the most complex of my career."

"The prosecution criminalists were extraordinary inept in not only the processing of the scene but also interpretation. The prosecution's key premise was that the two homicides were performed by one person, Corey Lyons. The evidence shows, however, there were two assailants that night, who were in no hurry to leave the scene after the murders. There is evidence of theft of at least one item and post-mortem manipulation of Daniel Lyon's body".

"There were three trials of Corey Lyons, the first ended in mistrial during the that trial, the second ended with a hung jury (seven jurors in favor of acquittal) and the final trial convicted after three hours deliberation. The defense attorney, Robert Sanger, presented a peculiar strategy in defense of Corey Lyons by only attacking the credibility of the prosecution criminalists, but not apparently presenting any expert opinion. In a telephone conversation with Mr. Sanger during the third trial, I offered to testify in the defense case essentially pro bono. In my opinion, Mr. Sanger elected to repeat the flawed strategy of the second trial with disastrous results for Corey Lyons."

I submitted three reports to Mr. Sanger (CAUTION: THERE ARE GRAPHIC IMAGES PRESENTED IN THESE REPORTS):


1.SCHARTON / LYONS AUTOPSY REPORT.pdf @ http://magicinsantabarbara.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lyons-autopsy-reports.pdf

2. Reconstruction of the homicide of Daniel Lyons (three parts):
LYONS HOMICIDE PART I.pdf; @ http://magicinsantabarbara.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lyons-homicide-i.pdf
LYONS HOMICIDE PART II.pdf;@ http://magicinsantabarbara.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lyons-homicide-part-ii1.pdf
LYONS HOMICIDE PART III.pdf @ http://magicinsantabarbara.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lyons-homicide-part-iii-1.pdf
 Gunshot residue analyses of Corey Lyons hands and possessions:
Lyons GS Rreport.pdf @ http://magicinsantabarbara.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lyonsgun-shot-residue-rreport.pdf



Below is my earlier posting dealing with just one tiny aspect of this case.
GSR on Lyons hands from an automatic Gun (murder weapon were 2 REVOLVERS OPPS!)
Date: 2012-01-10, 10:51PM PST
Reply to:

Santa Barbara District Attorney Joyce Dudley and her office of falsicutors has fallen from new heights. It seems they have gone from "Ruse Affidavits" to "Ruse" Convictions like the recent Corey Lyons murder conviction. A ruse is an action or plan which is intended to deceive someone and the Jury in the recent Corey Lyons murder trial was their latest target. In prosecutor Zonen's closing arguments he clearly stated that" Scharton was shot with a shotgun and .22 caliber(REVOLVER) gun, Daniel with a shotgun and .38 caliber(REVOLVER) gun."

In the Gun Shot Residue report below (GSR) the author reports that "The presence of copper in most of the hand three-component GSR particles Indicates it was generated by the firing of jacketed bullet(s). Jacketed bullets were not used in these homicides.' So I went on line to translate what the author was telling us here. Within ten minutes after reading that passage here is what I found http://www.wavesignal.com/Forensics/GSR.html

Bullets The bullet in an automatic pistol cartridge contains a lead core that is covered with a full metal jacket of copper alloyed with 5 to 10% zinc. Revolver bullets are generally composed of lead, or lead plated with a thin layer of copper, or the lead is alloyed with antimony or tin, or with both. In some bullets, such as hollow-point and soft-point bullets, a copper jacket covers the base and cylindrical portion, leaving a soft metal at the tip. Here is what I came up with;BASED ON THE GSR REPORT USED FOR THE COREY LYONS MURDER TRIAL THE FINDINGS ON THE DEFENDANTS HANDS ARE 'CONSISTENT WITH THAT OF A PERSON HAVING FIRED AN AUTOMATIC WEAPON AND NOT A REVOLVER. THE MURDER WEAPONS WERE A SHOTGUN, A 38 REVOLVER AND A 22 REVOLVER. How is it possible the Santa Barbara District Attorneys office missed that fact.

Due to my poor health I have been unable to create a better posting but one will be complete over this upcoming weekend. Read the GSR report for yourself @ www.meixatech.com/LyonsGSRreport.pdf

Location: murder weapon were 2 REVOLVERS OPPS!


 
S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!