To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Subject: FW: Those of you that know him need to ask Auditor-Controller R. Geis what is his error! Links to all by pension audit data year by year.
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:23:04 -0700
Subject: Those of you that know him need to ask Auditor-Controller R. Geis what is his error! Links to all by pension audit data year by year.
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:20:36 -0700
But wait no one from the controller's office addressed whether or not I am also correct that the pension was over 100% way back on 12/31/86. The proof of 102% pension for 1986 are in attachments 1,2 and 4 and there is no disputing these facts! The third attachment could not have been created until 2009(attachment 3). Compare the funded status for 1986 and 88(in attachments 1 and 2), with attachment 3. Be careful the 2009 report often only reports every other year until 1995. There is no disputing my findings that the pension values were retroactively altered from their original reported values. The archived audits I posses are on a CD labeled with the State Controllers markings. I need to present these findings and question them before the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. I also need to create a printed brochure with literature explaining why each audit and it's importance. This makes it much easier for everyone to follow along. The next big discover my research has exposed is the actual 26 year investment return. Through my research I found that the 26 yearly average exceeds 9.0%. All these facts leads us to one thing gentleman. It is IMPOSSIBLE for the pension to have any type of deficit and on the small side we have at least a one Billion dollar discrepancy with our county officials. Once we all are on the same page and understand the material there is NO WAY ANY ONE CAN PUBLICLY CHALLENGE MY FINDINGS!!!
SATURDAY, JULY 2, 2011
S.B.C.C.C. The place where COMMON SENSE never goes out of style!