Last week I shared with you that it seemed odd two recent major drug arrest had some how disappeared off the radar. I am of course referring to the drug arrest that had ties to the Santa Barbara D. A’s office ( Josh Lynn ). An the methamphetamine bust that charged William Paxson for maintaining a 1.8 million dollar dwelling for drug use/sales. No follow up story's could be found in any local media what so ever. I even tried to search with Google and nothing beyond the initial arrest information was available. So I took the time to go down the the Santa Barbara criminal records division and do some public records research and see what information was available.
While I was there I also filled out the required documentation so I may review Peter Jeschke's first case this week After that I looked up Erik Bjorklund and Kelsey O'Reilly and found there court case number 1350611. When I got home I went on the web site for the Santa Barbara Superior Court to search the calendering system, using there the case number. There are 9 total defendants who share this criminal case number. Yet my search on line using the case number produced results for just 1 of them, Rachel Ziemer. I thought how odd that my search would produce results for only 1 of the 9 defendant's. Now if you recall I had already used the first and last names of Erik an Kelsey before and nothing would come up in my search. Here are my results when I searched for calendering information using just the case number.
CASE NUMBER: 1350611 ( 9 defendants share this criminal case number )
ALL LM ALL SB ALL SM ALL SV LM1 SB1 SB2 SB3 SB7 SB8 SB9 SB11 SB12 SM3 SM6 SM7 SM8 SM9
OFFICERDEPT01/31/2011 - 1:30 pm 1350611 Rachel Ziemer Preliminary Hearing Jed Beebe SM7
The following is information for the selected Case.
Santa Maria Name
Erik Bjorklund Next Court Appearance 01/31/2011, 1:30 PM
Santa Maria, Division 7
Santa Maria, Division 7
Here are some numbers taken from the 1997/98 State Controllers report that was only supposed to include data up to 06/30/98
. The top of the page would say fund value as of 06/30/98 was 1,062,931,561.
Funded Ratio 91.5%
....June 98 1,062,931,561
6 months later the fund value is lower by 263 million dollars and reported as
December 98 799,539,999
Yet the return on investment 12/97 - 12/98 20%
You will find this data towards the bottom third of the picture below.
In the picture below in the section that shows a year to year history of the funds performance and fund ratio, why is the history for 12/31/97 missing?
In closing how was I able to create a link between missing criminal calendering data to real estate data and end up with discrepancy's with our Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System? Because we hold no one and no one accountable. From Superior Court Judges to tax collectors we offer a free ride, no pun intended.
If you click on the picture below and are at www.santabarbaracriminalcourtcorruption.blogspot.com
the picture will open up to a new window.