Thursday, November 25, 2010

1430 S. E. Street 93454 Lt. Governor why have you not been billed for Property taxes since December of 06?



Santa Barbara County Property Tax System
Bernice James, Treasurer-Tax Collector
   Santa Barbara (805)568-2920 | Santa Maria (805)346-8330









Shopping Cart

Supplemental Estimator

Payment History

Account Update

Help


of 1 Pages  |  Results per page
Property List:
 
Property NumberProperty TypeSupplemental EstimatorCurrent Property AddressProperty NotesTotal Due
117-820-34 SecuredRun None$0.00
of 1 Pages  |  Results per page
Bill Installment List:
Select the Pay button below to add installment to your shopping cart.
Installment NumberYearBill TypeInstallProperty AddressDelinquentPaidDue
117-820-34-00-9-1
The Assessors web
page identifies this
address with parcel#
117-820-040
2006Secured
MenuExpand Menu
12/10/2006$10,106.17
11/06/2006
$0.00Paid
117-820-34-00-9-2 2006Secured
MenuExpand Menu
04/10/2007$10,106.17
04/02/2007
$0.00Paid
Santa Barbara County Treasurer-Tax Collector Public Administrator Public Guardian



PAID                                Due

$10,106.17           $0.00
11/06/2006
 $10,106.17
04/02/2007         $0.00

 Is there corruption from our Santa Barbara County Assessor and Tax Collectors office?

Somebody should ask our Lt. Governor Able Maldonado to pay his fair share of taxes. Some one should check with the Santa Barbara County Tax Assessor and ask him why Parcel numbers do not match address's? I hope that Lt Governor Able Maldonado's property Taxes are brought current! This property shows a net assessed value of over 10,000,000 dollars and has not been billed for property taxes since 12/06

http://sbcassessor.com/Assessor
Property Information Parcel Number: 117-820-040 Address: 1430 S E ST SANTA MARIA, CA 93454 Transfer Date: 09/30/2005 TRA: 003048 Document #: Transfer Tax Amount: $2,200.00
Property Characteristics Use Description: Packing Plants Jurisdiction: City of Santa Maria Acreage: 12.24
2010 Assessed Values Land & Mineral Rights: $2,284,232 Improvements: $7,982,703 Personal Property: $606,320 Home Owner Exemption: ( $0) Other Exemption: ( $0) Net Assessed Value: $10,873,255


I have add this reply based on the comments I had to this posting.
Anonymous said...I did research the form 700 and those are not the APN numbers which correspond to the E street address you were talking about originally.You are correct that those APN numbers are listed. However, that is way at the other end of the valley and have nothing to with E. Street. If you keep digging you will also see there was some lot line adjustments done at what you are saying is Dos Rios which resulted in new and combined APN #'s.
Rest assured I would not have commented had I not been sure that E Street (which was your original big complaint) was not associated with Mr. Maldonado.
November 26, 2010 9:21 AM

Again I ask is there corruption from our Santa Barbara County Assessor and Tax Collectors office? Let me start this off with the fact I agree it should not be this hard to verify a property address to a parcel number to a property tax bill, but why is it?
In your first comment you ask me why do the tax statements say zero due if they are delinquent. You are correct they say zero due from the 12/06 tax bill. The problem is why has the Santa Barbara County assessor and tax collector stopped billing for property taxes on that parcel?  Than you state "If you look further to find the owner of that property you will see the title is held by Driscoll Strawberry Growers. The last time I checked Mr. Maldonado was in NO way connected to this company."  Now I ask you; DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHERE MY DATA AND QUESTIONS ARE COMING FROM? MY DATA COMES FROM MR. MALDONADO HIMSELF BY WAY OF HIS FILING TO THE CALIFORNIA FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION LOCATED @ http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.php?id=550 Mr. Maldonado claims on his Form 700 to be involved with the corporation Agro-J Framing of which he sits with the title 'Controller" an states he makes over 100k from that position. He than list Tri M. Rental group as a partner. Since this information is filed on his Schedule A-2 we automatically know that means he has a 10% interest or greater. Now if you review my earlier posting I did also question why the different identifying parcels numbers for the same address. Go back to to the posting you you are originally commenting on. The Tax collector bill has a parcel listing of 117-820-34-00 an address of 1430 S.E. street 93454
Yet the County assessors web site has the address 1430 S E street tied into parcel identified as 117-820-040 So why the confusion on the assessors part? Than the assessor shows a 2010 assessed value of over 10,000,000 yet no billing for property taxes. An that is what I am asking. Why is there no new billing ? Why the confusion on the assessor's part.

Now we have the same kind of misdirection involved in another portion of Mr. Maldonado's Form 700.

http://sbcassessor.com/Assessor/Results.aspx?APN=117820&HN=&SN=&UN=&SB=SB_APN

117-820-028 1850 STOWELL RD
What happen to 117-820-034? This A.P.N. is listed on Pg 12 of the form 700  An the Santa Barbara Tax collector has billing for this parcel, just look again at the top of this page and there is the billing!
117-820-036 1767 A ST
117-820-037 1735 A ST
117-820-039
117-820-040 1430 E ST

Why would Mr. Maldonado be confessed as to any parcel modification to property he owns, the assessed value reflects a current 2010 value? I am sorry your argument just does not hold water. Feel free to paste your findings here so we may all verify your statements.

Double click on pictures below to see in there own window.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

As a resident of Santa Maria I was troubled by this statement. I decided to do some research of my own. Why do the tax installments you post say zero due if they are deliquent? Why when you look at the property tax website for that address does it show them current (because they are)? There are no taxes owed by Mr. Maldonado or his family business. If you look further to find the owner of that proberty you will see the title is held by Driscoll Strawberry Growers. The last time I checked Mr. Maldonado was in NO way connected to this company. Why would you post such un-truths? Perhaps to sway people to your own beliefs? Unfortunatley people belive what they read. It is such "reports" that have lead our state into such a mess by influencing people. Why would you want people to believe such things about an individual who could have possibly helped our state out of its current condition. You should do more research before accusing good people of bad things.

Magic said...

On page 10 of of our Lt Governors form 700 Schedule A-2
There is a list of property by A.P.N. numbers listed
Rancho Dos Rios Farm Land

129-040-01
129-040-08
129-040-09
129-040-10
So I went to look up the property by parcel number and 129-040-09 is missing!Yet I can trace a property tax bill that was last billed in 12/06 and has not been billed since. I wish you would research the form 700 before making inaccurate statements on my blog!

Assessor Parcel Number (APN) Situs Address
129-040-001 4110 FUGLER RD
129-040-002
129-040-003
129-040-007 4345 SANTA MARIA MESA RD
129-040-008 3333 FOXEN CANYON RD
129-040-010 4651 SANTA MARIA MESA RD


129-040-09 Secured Run ADDRESS NOT AVAILABLE None $0.00
of 1 Pages | Results per page
Bill Installment List:
Select the Pay button below to add installment to your shopping cart.
Installment Number Year Bill Type Install Property Address Delinquent Paid Due
129-040-09-00-4-1 2006 Secured
Menu Expand Menu
View Installment
Print Installment
Scroll up
Scroll down
ADDRESS NOT AVAILABLE 12/10/2006 $19,963.91
12/04/2006 $0.00 Paid
129-040-09-00-4-2 2006 Secured
Menu Expand Menu
View Installment
Print Installment
Scroll up
Scroll down
ADDRESS NOT AVAILABLE 04/10/2007 $19,963.91
12/04/2006 $0.00 Paid
Almost 40k a year in property taxes
I will add some research in my next blog posting.

Anonymous said...

I did research the form 700 and those are not the APN numbers which correspond to the E street address you were talking about originally.You are correct that those APN numbers are listed. However, that is way at the other end of the valley and have nothing to with E. Street. If you keep digging you will also see there was some lot line adjustments done at what you are saying is Dos Rios which resulted in new and combined APN #'s.
Rest assured I would not have commented had I not been sure that E Street (which was your original big complaint) was not associated with Mr. Maldonado.

Magic said...

Again I ask is there corruption from our Santa Barbara County Assessor and Tax Collectors office? Let me start this off with the fact I agree it should not be this hard to verify a property address to a parcel number to a property tax bill, but it is. Why is that?

In your first comment you ask me why do the tax statements say zero due if they are delinquent. You are correct they say zero due from the 12/06 tax bill. The problem is why has the Santa Barbara County assessor and tax collector stopped billing for property taxes on that parcel? Than you state "If you look further to find the owner of that property you will see the title is held by Driscoll Strawberry Growers. The last time I checked Mr. Maldonado was in NO way connected to this company." Now I ask you; DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHERE MY DATA AND QUESTIONS ARE COMING FROM? MY DATA COMES FROM MR. MALDONADO HIMSELF BY WAY OF HIS FILING TO THE CALIFORNIA FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION LOCATED @ http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.php?id=550 Mr. Maldonado claims on his Form 700 to be involved with the corporation Agro-J Framing of which he sits with the title 'Controller" an states he makes over 100k from that position. He than list Tri M. Rental group as a partner. Since this information is filed on his Schedule A-2 we automatically know that means he has a 10% interest or greater. Now if you review my earlier posting I did also question why the different identifying parcels numbers for the same address. Go back to to the posting you you are originally commenting on. The Tax collector bill has a parcel listing of 117-820-34-00 an address of 1430 S.E. street 93454
Yet the County assessors web site has the address 1430 S E street tied into parcel identified as 117-820-040 So why the confusion on the assessors part? Than the assessor shows a 2010 assessed value of over 10,000,000 yet no billing for property taxes. An that is what I am asking. Why is there no new billing ? Why the confusion on the assessor's part.