I found more Santa Barbara Superior Court documents from Mr. Brown at;
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449.case.index.htm
When you click on a boxed document subject below matter a link will appear so you may go and view that document.
Santa Barbara Superior Court 209449, Family Law
What this page can mean to you and your future.The best that can come from all of this is that our society develops a robust and competent and understanding of our unconscious existence and how it controls our world. At the root of all of this is the subpoena of records which expose a socially harrowing capacity of human mental potential and performance or behavior associated with it... That mental and capacity is the most strictly taboo subject
This case began with its documentation in 1997 with a prejudiced judge exhibiting his inability to observe a conspiracy, then with his failure to observe his prejudice when documented for him with a Motion to disqualify.
The Federal suit CV99-11189 found at http://www.angelfire.com/ca5/nojustice/11189comp.html provides documentation and some links to actions filed in case 209449.
ADVISEMENT:
Note, aspects of CV99-11189 have bizarre elements and should be taken with the understanding that our society DOES NOT know everything about the human mind and the plaintiff of that suit, the respondent in these family law actions, had just learned quite a bit more than is generally accepted in this society. The suit was filed in desperation with a knowingness that the unknown aspects of our human unconscious mind were going to be exploited to create massive terrorism (9-11) and unending war in the middle east.
That judge from 1997 was sued in small claims court for filing fees and failed to appear. Santa Barbara County colluded with the State Superior Courts to evade State laws of record keeping. The California State superior Court also colluded with their own to avoid accountability to state laws of their judges.
This is not a complete documentation of this case. What is done here is the meaningful aspects, that NEED to be shown for the public to understand HOW far from reasonable performance our courts have gone. With that come the responsibility to decide to allow it, or oppose it.
Below, notice that the respondent has filed many legal defenses but the petitioner, County of Santa Barbara has filed only one. This is because the commissioner is acting to prosecute the Counties case.
I found this court document from commissioner Colleen Sterne @ This is not a complete documentation of this case. What is done here is the meaningful aspects, that NEED to be shown for the public to understand HOW far from reasonable performance our courts have gone. With that come the responsibility to decide to allow it, or oppose it.
Below, notice that the respondent has filed many legal defenses but the petitioner, County of Santa Barbara has filed only one. This is because the commissioner is acting to prosecute the Counties case.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449.dec.sterne.disq.ans.html
Below: Lines 17 - 18 are erroneous and false. My motion to Quash was never heard. That erro is the basis for my motion to strike this declaration. I have ADHD and simply cannot keep track from day to day or week to week of any matters consistently. The trauma of legal abuse exacerbates the ADHD and is essentially PTSD
No comments:
Post a Comment